| Author |
Thread |
|
Love Monkey
Junior Member
United Kingdom
113 posts
Joined: Apr, 2002
|
 Posted - 2002/06/29 : 06:30:46
If i resample wavs from 44khz to 96khz will it reduce the quality in any way?
I ask because the majority of my drum samples are 16/44 and i want to record the output from my synths into cubase at 24/96.
In the words of Ali G: "Give a man a compilation tape and he'll dance for a night. Teach a man to scratch, and he'll be dancing for generations!"
Alert moderator 
|
djmonoxide
Junior Member
United States
128 posts
Joined: Jul, 2001
|
Posted - 2002/06/29 : 19:28:54
Im not absolutly sure but i think u should be fine back the wav file up and try it to find out.
quote:
Originally posted by Love Monkey:
If i resample wavs from 44khz to 96khz will it reduce the quality in any way?
I ask because the majority of my drum samples are 16/44 and i want to record the output from my synths into cubase at 24/96.
In the words of Ali G: "Give a man a compilation tape and he'll dance for a night. Teach a man to scratch, and he'll be dancing for generations!"
I used to be a raver, used to take lots of E. Now I just smoke weed, and you know I will Succeed. :)
__________________________________
_____________________
What seams to be the officulty difficer?
Alert moderator
|
DJ Mouse
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
2,687 posts
Joined: Jul, 2001
|
Posted - 2002/06/30 : 05:33:53
it won't change the sound quality at all,and it'll just take up a load of space on your drive.
--------------------------------------------------
"Don't frown when someone annoys you, it uses 42 muscles. Bitch-slap the fu©ker, it only uses 4"
DJ Mouse
Alert moderator
|
Padre
New Member
Australia
66 posts
Joined: Oct, 2001
|
Posted - 2002/07/02 : 00:05:31
it really depends on what u mean by resampling...
its hard to say, but if ur raw (original) wav is on a track, and you resample your song into one wav as a completed work, it shoudlnt make a difference...
if ur using a wav editor and resampling internally, the actual bitrate will force a change in pitch, the higher the resolution, the faster the pitch (ie speed it up).
i cant think of any good examples right now coz i have a shockin migraine...
:(
------------------------------
For we are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams - Willy Wonka
www.letdabasskick.homestead.com
www.austech.info
__________________________________
------------------------------
For we are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams - Willy Wonka
www.letdabasskick.homestead.com
www.austech.info
Alert moderator
|
Love Monkey
Junior Member
United Kingdom
113 posts
Joined: Apr, 2002
|
Posted - 2002/07/02 : 14:28:51
yeah i mean resampling in a wave editor just so that i can record everything else at 24/96 to eventually dither down to 44/16
btw i know a lot about migraines if you need any help
In the words of Ali G: "Give a man a compilation tape and he'll dance for a night. Teach a man to scratch, and he'll be dancing for generations!"
Alert moderator
|
Lusive
Average Member
Australia
151 posts
Joined: May, 2001
|
Posted - 2002/07/06 : 14:01:27
its a huge waste of space, and it depends on what program you are using to do the mixing. you should be able to get a vst or DX realtime resampler.. ie a plugin that you load and plays the 44.1 khz sample acurately on a 96khz stream. I dont know an exact name cause i have never had to use it..
That would save space and time, provided you had a decent enough computer to use the vst/dx plugin.
If i can think of a name of one i'll repost.
| A good way to threaten somebody is to light a stick of dynamite. Then you call the guy and hold the burning fuse up to the phone. "Hear that?" you say. "That's dynamite, baby." -Jack Handy |
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
